Publication ethics and malpractice statement - XLinguae

Go to content

Main menu:

Publication ethics and malpractice statement

Agreement upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the author, the journal editor-in-chief, the peer reviewers and the publisher. (The following ethic statements are based on COPE‘s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors).

Publication decisions 
The publication of an article in our double-blind peer-reviewed journal concerns linguistics, applied linguistics and philology fields. The editor-in-chief of the XLinguae journal is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The editor-in-chief may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editor-in-chief confers with other editors or reviewers in making this decision. They evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors. The editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate. Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.

Duties of Reviewers and Editors 
Double-blind peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the experts form the scientific board and the author may also assist the author in improving the paper. If any selected editor referee who feels unqualified to review the research and the manuscript article should notify the editor-in-chief and excuse himself from the review process.
Manuscripts received for review are treated as confidential documents and are reviewed by anonymous editor staff. They will not be shown to or discussed with others except the editor-in-chief´s authorisation. Reviews should be conducted objectively: editor referees express their views clearly with supporting arguments. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review is to be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement, an observation, derivation, or argument that had been reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge. 
Editors who abuse their function in the journal in order to get published or who do things which are considered malpractice will be excluded from the editorial board.
The editor-in-chief cannot abuse his function either. He or she should not submit an article to the review process to the same journal he or she manages. It is considered as misconduct.
Papers submitted with the topic that does not reflect the scope of the journal or abilities of our editors (as for example reviewing chinese or arabic, and so on) will not be processed.

Duties of Authors 
Authors of contributions and research studies should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Manuscripts in MS Word must be submitted using the TEMPLATE format and written in one of the following languages (Slovak, Czech, Spanish, French, Italian, Russian, English) following the rules of academic style where high-quality grammar and style are essential. Submissions must include:
- the main text of the very final author´s version of the scientific article about language, linguistics (phonetics, morphology, lexicology, terminology, pragmatics, stylistics, syntax), methodology of teaching language or translation, philosophy (without author´s identification) sent in attachment using the TEMPLATE format 1 (introduction, main text, research results, conclusion, appendixes, bibliographic references, citations of relevant research mentionned in scientificaly recognised monographs, databases - Scopus, WOS and scientifically recognised journals) 
- the following elements (sent in the e-mail): title, authors (5 max.), affiliations (professional institution address), contacts, academic e-mails, abstracts in English and in the language of the text (Slovak, Czech, Italian, Spanish, French, Russian or English), key words in English and in the languague of the text (Slovak, Czech, Italian, Spanish, French, Russian or English)author´s agreement to receive a printed copy if the article is accepted, author´s note that the submitted article was not published elsewhere and is not under consideration by any other journal, link on your professional university or academic website if you do not provide us with the academic e-mail address.
- the questionnaire the QUESTIONNAIRE format (sent as attachment using the questionnaire form).
Originality, Research done in the field or Contribution to and advancement of the research field (linguistics, applied linguistics, philosophy), scientific impact of the paper are considered as key points when considering the scientific study.

The paper should be formatted into Template pages, with the title in 10-point Times New Roman, abstracts, key words, main text, bibliographic references and professional signature in 9-point Times New Roman, in single-spaced one-column format. Figures and tables must be sized as they are to appear in print (the best is to copy them into the text as a figure - printscreen of the table). Figures should be placed exactly where they are to appear within the text. Other formats are not acceptable. Authors submit their papers electronically through e-mail to the Journal's submission address
The paper should be sent from the professional (academic institution) e-mail address. If you do not use or do not have your professional e-mail address, you are supposed to introduce yourself by putting in the e-mail the link on your professional university or academic website, otherwise your paper might not be accepted as we cannot know whether you are an academic professional in the field of linguistics, applied linguistics or philosophy. 
The authors are asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review. If you need some corrections for your text in English language, please, use or contact If your English is on sufficiant level, the paper will go through the review process. If editors decide that the paper should pass through correction process, the author has to get corrected his article elsewhere or he/ she might ask our editorial board and be charged some more fees. The authors should ensure they have written entirely original works, and if they have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted. Authors should not publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable. Proper acknowledgement of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. 

Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors (maximum 5 authors). Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors or you can cite them, cite their work. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication. All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed. When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author´s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.
The scientific impact of the papers SNIP and SJR of the XLinguae journal is assured by the established connections with the well-known indexing database ELSEVIER Products – SCOPUS (since 2011) and Scimago journal ranking service. When sending a scientific paper, authors should note that we are obliged to review a number of papers and these are considered and judged in hierarchy. 

All manuscripts will be subject to a well established, fair, unbiased peer review and refereeing procedure, and considered on the basis of their significance, novelty and usefulness to the journal´s readership. We highly recommend you to send papers containing research, innovation, analyses. The reviewers' identities remain anonymous to authors. The review process may take several weeks. Each paper will be provided with a paper ID for further reference and anonymous reviewers will be in contact with you via if the article is accepted with the minor changes. 
The review output will be one of the following decisions: 
A, Accept; 
B, Accept with minor changes (several points regarding bibliographic references or other formal mistakes or lapsus in the text); 
C, Reject (the paper does not correspond to the scope of our journal, author´s malpractice, an incorrect methodology procedure, not an original study, not an innovative study, no research done, a study with no relevant citation, a study with an insufficiant language terminology and a poor level, a study considered by reviewers as not a scientific one but a popular one, a study with nearly no scientific impact in the reserach field). 

If required, authors need to revise the paper according to reviewer's comments. After publishing, the authors will receive a copy of the journal or may download the study from the journal´s website. They are supposed to point it out in the first folder when sending the mail with the article.
An invoice might be sent to authors if they send complete information (name, address, country, codes, ID or what they need to have on an invoice) to .

Please, consult the section Submission guidelines.

We do not reply on insultations or hating posts on our journal which are not justified. Our journal is a high quality liguistic journal with a high reputation. See reviews from colleagues here.
Back to content | Back to main menu